Skip to main content

Google, authors wrangle in court again over digital books


Google, authors wrangle in court again over digital books

The authors are asking for $3 billion in damages related to Google's digital books project, while Google is asking for class action status to be revoked.

Google and the Authors Guild are wrangling in court again, with the latter asking for $3 billion in damages related to Google's digital books project.
Lawyers for the two companies on Wednesday presented their oral arguments in an appeal hearing related to class action status for the suit. A judge in the Second Circuit Court in New York last year had granted the Authors Guild the ability to sue Google as a group, but the search giant on Wednesday argued that such status shouldn't be granted.
The company in the past has cited a survey that showed more than half of the authors polled approved of Google scanning their books so the content could be searched online. A full 45 percent said they had already seen or expect to see higher demand for their books as a result of the scanning. And 19 percent said they've benefited financially from the scanning.
"The investment we have made in Google Books benefits readers and writers alike, helping unlock the great pool of knowledge contained in millions of books," a Google spokesperson said Wednesday.
We've contacted the Authors Guild and will update the report when we have more information.
There has been a lot of speculation over the years about the amount of damages Google could face. The Authors Guild has been looking for payment of $750 per "infringed book." Based on the $3 billion number cited Wednesday, that encompasses only about a fifth of the more than 20 million books Google has scanned.
Google and the Authors Guild have been battling about digitizing books for nearly a decade. The Authors Guild in 2005 filed suit and said that Google's book scanning constitutes copyright infringement. In 2008, the two sides reached an agreement whereby Google would have paid authors and publishers $125 million in return for scanning and selling their copyrighted works.
However, that settlement was thrown out in 2011 by New York federal district court Judge Denny Chin, who ruled that it would have given Google an unfair advantage over its competitors. In May of last year, Chin gave the Authors Guild the legal go-ahead to proceed with its class action suit. In August, however, the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals found that Google could appeal Chin's ruling.
The oral arguments Wednesday are the next step in Google's appeal process. The main case over the book scanning has been on hold until the class action status is resolved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 app icon redesigns: The good, the bad and the ugly

10 app icon redesigns: The good, the bad and the ugly Redesigns happen. Whether a certain look has gone out of style, a brand's direction has changed, or it's just time for something fresh, many popular apps have changed the design of their icons. Instagram just changed its app icon, and while a new look was probably a good idea, many aren't happy about it.   nstagram is far from the first app to go through this. Sometimes it's a home run, but it's rare. More often a changed icon either takes a while to get used to or is just plain bad. Occasionally, the redesign lives in infamy.  May notable icon redesigns came after after Apple transitioned from iOS 6 to iOS 7, introducing a new design philosophy that departed from the skeuomorphism (think: leather texture and wood trim) of the past and embracing a more flat, simple aesthetic. Apps like Messages, Phone, Mail and Weather dropped the gloss in favor of minimalism, and plenty of third-party ap...

GE GAS18PSJSS Top Freezer Refrigerator with Autofill Pitcher review:

 GE GAS18PSJSS Top Freezer Refrigerator with Autofill Pitcher review:  Get automatic water pitcher fill-ups from this top-freezer fridge The Good The Autofill Pitcher is a unique feature that works well and seems practical for daily use -- a rarity with top freezers. Despite the plain-looking design, the fridge feels sturdy and well-constructed. The Bad Storage space is cramped to begin with, let alone with the Autofill Pitcher taking up space on the top shelf. Cooling performance was also pretty unexceptional. The Bottom Line The Autofill Pitcher is a borderline ingenious fridge feature, but the GAS18PSJSS isn't well-rounded enough to be a top pick. for price and more click here

The Future Of Work: Why Innovation Is Every Employee’s Job

 The Future Of Work: Why Innovation Is Every Employee’s Job  PSFK Labs sits down with management at Johnson & Johnson to learn how the company comes up with their next ‘big idea’ Where do a company’s best ideas come from? Even in the most progressive organizations, groundbreaking change is expected from research and development teams, internal incubators or its high-level executives—overlooking untapped potential on other teams to provide and collaborate on ideas. In the Future of Work by PSFK Labs , Steve Garguilo, leader of Creative Engagement at Johnson & Johnson , shares how the company creates an environment and culture that encourages every department to be a part of initiating the next big company change. Read More: Click here